
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plurk Rivals Twitter as the Next Popular Microblogging Platform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidethewebb.com/2010/01/plurk-rivals-twitter-as-the-next-popular-microblogging-platform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidethewebb.com/2010/01/plurk-rivals-twitter-as-the-next-popular-microblogging-platform/</link>
	<description>Getting Inside Some of the Web&#039;s Finest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:19:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bounce House</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethewebb.com/2010/01/plurk-rivals-twitter-as-the-next-popular-microblogging-platform/#comment-56519</link>
		<dc:creator>Bounce House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethewebb.com/?p=439#comment-56519</guid>
		<description>It doesn’t matter how many positive features Plurk has over the Twitter. The majority of Twitter members use it because it became a “must have” tool for their businesses. There are users who hate Twitter but they spend at least 5-8 hours per week to announce something on twitter about their business just to get some visibility. I am sure if one day Google announces that it takes into consideration Plurk’s content when they deliver search results there will be a major switch and most of the users will start “tweeting” on Plurk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn’t matter how many positive features Plurk has over the Twitter. The majority of Twitter members use it because it became a “must have” tool for their businesses. There are users who hate Twitter but they spend at least 5-8 hours per week to announce something on twitter about their business just to get some visibility. I am sure if one day Google announces that it takes into consideration Plurk’s content when they deliver search results there will be a major switch and most of the users will start “tweeting” on Plurk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archon Digital</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethewebb.com/2010/01/plurk-rivals-twitter-as-the-next-popular-microblogging-platform/#comment-4984</link>
		<dc:creator>Archon Digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethewebb.com/?p=439#comment-4984</guid>
		<description>I tried Plurk briefly but couldn&#039;t find time to use it regularly. My uses for twitter are both for personal and business. I actually like the Plurk interface but there seems to be a lot more powerful stuff you can do with a network on Twitter.
.-= Archon Digital´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/archondigital/~3/gefA07pH3KU/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter vs Plurk – Which is Better?&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried Plurk briefly but couldn&#8217;t find time to use it regularly. My uses for twitter are both for personal and business. I actually like the Plurk interface but there seems to be a lot more powerful stuff you can do with a network on Twitter.<br />
.-= Archon Digital´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/archondigital/~3/gefA07pH3KU/" rel="nofollow">Twitter vs Plurk – Which is Better?</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revue de Blogs &#8211; Semaine 05/2010 &#171; Digital Reputation Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethewebb.com/2010/01/plurk-rivals-twitter-as-the-next-popular-microblogging-platform/#comment-3974</link>
		<dc:creator>Revue de Blogs &#8211; Semaine 05/2010 &#171; Digital Reputation Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethewebb.com/?p=439#comment-3974</guid>
		<description>[...] Plurk Rivals Twitter as the Next Popular Microblogging Platform [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Plurk Rivals Twitter as the Next Popular Microblogging Platform [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert_M</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethewebb.com/2010/01/plurk-rivals-twitter-as-the-next-popular-microblogging-platform/#comment-3967</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethewebb.com/?p=439#comment-3967</guid>
		<description>While you have done a great job at writing a convincing review, I can&#039;t quite yet follow your lead. Though the idea is appealing, I just can&#039;t get into reading updates in a horizontal fashion.

And while it&#039;s beyond me how Twitter got so huge with its vast amount of flaws, it is an essential tool these days to get business done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you have done a great job at writing a convincing review, I can&#8217;t quite yet follow your lead. Though the idea is appealing, I just can&#8217;t get into reading updates in a horizontal fashion.</p>
<p>And while it&#8217;s beyond me how Twitter got so huge with its vast amount of flaws, it is an essential tool these days to get business done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethewebb.com/2010/01/plurk-rivals-twitter-as-the-next-popular-microblogging-platform/#comment-3955</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethewebb.com/?p=439#comment-3955</guid>
		<description>I used Plurk once. Just for a few weeks when it first came out. I left it.

The gradings that existed annoyed me, the sideways timeline was just totally unnatural, the colours and design faults and lack of community and choose-your-own pretext...

This story is years behind.
.-= Nicole&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/nicolejensen/statuses/8629161524&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nicolejensen: RT @franksting: found recent article. says plurk will be the next twitter. 2008 called. they want their story back. http://bit.ly/bvnOLQ ...&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used Plurk once. Just for a few weeks when it first came out. I left it.</p>
<p>The gradings that existed annoyed me, the sideways timeline was just totally unnatural, the colours and design faults and lack of community and choose-your-own pretext&#8230;</p>
<p>This story is years behind.<br />
.-= Nicole&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://twitter.com/nicolejensen/statuses/8629161524" rel="nofollow">nicolejensen: RT @franksting: found recent article. says plurk will be the next twitter. 2008 called. they want their story back. </a><a href="http://bit.ly/bvnOLQ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bvnOLQ</a> &#8230; =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patsy</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethewebb.com/2010/01/plurk-rivals-twitter-as-the-next-popular-microblogging-platform/#comment-3954</link>
		<dc:creator>patsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethewebb.com/?p=439#comment-3954</guid>
		<description>2008 called, they want their story back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2008 called, they want their story back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheryl A. McCoy</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethewebb.com/2010/01/plurk-rivals-twitter-as-the-next-popular-microblogging-platform/#comment-3786</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheryl A. McCoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethewebb.com/?p=439#comment-3786</guid>
		<description>Plurk or Twitter is not really the point of all this. Twitter serves the SEO in everyone, and Plurk serves those who are in collaborative conversations on a topic. 
Plurk is more than a forum and less than a stream of consciousness.

The reason Plurk commands a position as a rival for Twitter is the acceptance is has in the part of Earth where most people live. http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/14/microsoft-plurk-ripoff/
.-= Sheryl A. McCoy&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/n2teaching/~3/jhKScDWCLLo/n2teaching&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Links for 2010-01-26 [del.icio.us]&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plurk or Twitter is not really the point of all this. Twitter serves the SEO in everyone, and Plurk serves those who are in collaborative conversations on a topic.<br />
Plurk is more than a forum and less than a stream of consciousness.</p>
<p>The reason Plurk commands a position as a rival for Twitter is the acceptance is has in the part of Earth where most people live. <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/14/microsoft-plurk-ripoff/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/14/microsoft-plurk-ripoff/</a><br />
.-= Sheryl A. McCoy&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/n2teaching/~3/jhKScDWCLLo/n2teaching" rel="nofollow">Links for 2010-01-26 [del.icio.us]</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jumpness</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethewebb.com/2010/01/plurk-rivals-twitter-as-the-next-popular-microblogging-platform/#comment-3758</link>
		<dc:creator>Jumpness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethewebb.com/?p=439#comment-3758</guid>
		<description>There are going to be a lot of websites that &quot;might be better than Twitter.&quot; Like any business that is popular, new companies enter hoping to be better. There is always someone out there trying to think of a way to make a current product or service better. In my opinion Twitter is pretty basic. They are so popular, but it&#039;s mostly because they were the first in the market. Who is going to be the business that comes in and makes it &quot;cooler?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are going to be a lot of websites that &#8220;might be better than Twitter.&#8221; Like any business that is popular, new companies enter hoping to be better. There is always someone out there trying to think of a way to make a current product or service better. In my opinion Twitter is pretty basic. They are so popular, but it&#8217;s mostly because they were the first in the market. Who is going to be the business that comes in and makes it &#8220;cooler?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revue de Blogs &#8211; Semaine 03/2010 &#171; Digital Reputation Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethewebb.com/2010/01/plurk-rivals-twitter-as-the-next-popular-microblogging-platform/#comment-3670</link>
		<dc:creator>Revue de Blogs &#8211; Semaine 03/2010 &#171; Digital Reputation Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethewebb.com/?p=439#comment-3670</guid>
		<description>[...] Plurk Rivals Twitter as the Next Popular Microblogging Platform [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Plurk Rivals Twitter as the Next Popular Microblogging Platform [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethewebb.com/2010/01/plurk-rivals-twitter-as-the-next-popular-microblogging-platform/#comment-3586</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethewebb.com/?p=439#comment-3586</guid>
		<description>I was an early adopter (and I only say that because I had an account shortly after the site opened) of Plurk and, while it was fun for a little while, it got very old very fast. 

While some of the &quot;features (if you can call them that)&quot; are nice, Plurk has one major shortcoming, IMO: A total lack of a public timeline. There used to be one but, in order to keep the system from crapping out (something it did/still does frequently), it was removed it in favor of a lame search. How is anyone supposed to find anyone else on that website anymore? The bottom line is that it isn&#039;t easy and unless you&#039;ve been using the service for a while to build up your little &quot;clique (for want of a better word),&quot; you&#039;re going to do a lot of talking to yourself.

I&#039;ve since completely deleted my account because, in the end, there was 0 ROI for the amount of time spent on there, scrolling through updates and reading (the usually inane) comments. To say Plurk is a &quot;Twitter rival&quot; is a gross misstatement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was an early adopter (and I only say that because I had an account shortly after the site opened) of Plurk and, while it was fun for a little while, it got very old very fast. </p>
<p>While some of the &#8220;features (if you can call them that)&#8221; are nice, Plurk has one major shortcoming, IMO: A total lack of a public timeline. There used to be one but, in order to keep the system from crapping out (something it did/still does frequently), it was removed it in favor of a lame search. How is anyone supposed to find anyone else on that website anymore? The bottom line is that it isn&#8217;t easy and unless you&#8217;ve been using the service for a while to build up your little &#8220;clique (for want of a better word),&#8221; you&#8217;re going to do a lot of talking to yourself.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve since completely deleted my account because, in the end, there was 0 ROI for the amount of time spent on there, scrolling through updates and reading (the usually inane) comments. To say Plurk is a &#8220;Twitter rival&#8221; is a gross misstatement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

